i think i like spending time by my lonesome more than i did in the past. sometimes i think that correlates with discussions about topics i onced eagerly joined. i used to love to jump right into lively topics about books, movies, theology, conservation....i still usually do, just with less enthusiasm now. these lofty conversations that once stirred so much excitement can just feel tired. not that i dont care about that kind of stuff, but at times it just feels like yerking the gerk... forgive the vulgarity.
hmm i wonder if thats true. this posting begs to differ. and last night we saw the happening, and i think i talked the most about it afterwards. yeah maybe its true, because i was more hesitant (at least in my head) in wanting to talk about it. and while i still do it, the aversion is more connected to joining a conversation about this kind of subject matter that is already going. i guess it doesnt really matter either way. im just thinking out loud right now.
4 comments:
the happening was one of the worst movies i have seen in a long time. it was terrible- and the message about protecting the earth hit over the head like a ton of bricks.
I hope you do not take offense to cinema made in Philadelphia as a result.
what is it about jumping into an ongoing conversation that you don't like anymore? feel free to take this as a rhetorical question, or one to be answered in person.
i mean, like, as opposed to starting a conversation.
something to do with trying to prove how much i think i know, or just like the debate more than the subject or something...disingenuine.sp
Post a Comment